Skip to Main Content
Sign Up

The work of mapmaking and geospatial data analysis provide an entry point for critical geographers, critical GISers, and radical cartographers to intervene in geovisual rhetorics that often reify and privilege the expertise of mapmakers. This leveraging of expertise requires deeper ethical considerations, as the power of a drawn line moves decision-makers and members of the public toward a finality that is often too neat, too tidy. In this presentation, we discuss our experiences being interpolated as experts in public debates on gentrification in Lexington, Kentucky. We discuss the resonances and responsibilities of community mapping at a moment when there are many maps, but fewer stories told through them.

 

Speaker Information

Matthew W. Wilson is Chair and Professor of Geography at the University of Kentucky and Associate at the Center for Geographic Analysis at Harvard University. He directs Mapshop, a community mapping lab, and he is an editor at cultural geographies, an international, peer-reviewed quarterly journal. His most recent book is New Lines: Critical GIS and the Trouble of the Map (University of Minnesota Press). He has previously taught at Ball State University and the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and his current research examines mid-20th century, digital mapping practices.

Emily Barrett is a doctoral student in the Community Research and Action Program at Vanderbilt University. Her research interests include the politics of data-driven and participatory urban planning, the racial logics of municipal budgeting and urban development, and social justice movements in the American South.

 

0 people are interested in this event


Zoom link: https://go.fiu.edu/ethicaldata
Meeting ID: 937 2537 3470
Passcode: 3mxmmF

User Activity

No recent activity

Diverse group of FIU students put their paws up

Statement of Free Expression

FIU endorses the Florida Board of Governors' Statement of Free Expression to support and encourage full and open discourse and the robust exchange of ideas and perspectives on our campuses. In addition to supporting this legal right, we view this as an integral part of our ability to deliver a high-quality academic experience for our students, engage in meaningful and productive research, and provide valuable public service. This includes fostering civil and open dialogue in support of critical thinking in and out of the classroom, including events hosted by the university.