Skip to Main Content
Sign Up

1250 SW 108th Ave Room 110, Miami, FL 33174

#speakerseries
View map Free Event

Longitudinal studies of multifinality and equifinality can reveal important sources of heterogeneity in clinical phenotypes. I will focus on the examples of irritability in children and adolescents, and depression in adolescents and young adults.

Irritability is arguably the most common clinical presentation in youth. It is also a prime exemplar of multifinality, predicting the full gamut of internalizing and externalizing problems. However, within irritability, there are separable tonic and phasic dimensions. In a number of samples, we have shown that tonic irritability is uniquely associated with and predicts internalizing outcomes, while phasic irritability is uniquely associated with and predicts externalizing outcomes. Distinguishing these dimensions may provide clues for advancing the understanding and treatment of irritability.

There are numerous pathways to developing depressive disorders (equifinality). Importantly, once established, the life course of depression is very variable: some individuals experience a time-limited course and others a chronic-intermittent course. I will present data indicating that these two course patterns can be differentiated even before the first lifetime onset of depression. These findings suggest the value of a life history approach to understanding the heterogeneity of depression.

Learning objectives

1. Explain the meaning and relationships among the following terms: multifinality, transdiagnostic, equifinality, and heterogeneity.

2. Discuss the tonic and phasic components of irritability and the evidence supporting this distinction.

3. Describe why longitudinal course may be useful in parsing the heterogeneity of depressive disorders.

 

1 person is interested in this event

User Activity

No recent activity

Diverse group of FIU students put their paws up

Statement of Free Expression

FIU endorses the Florida Board of Governors' Statement of Free Expression to support and encourage full and open discourse and the robust exchange of ideas and perspectives on our campuses. In addition to supporting this legal right, we view this as an integral part of our ability to deliver a high-quality academic experience for our students, engage in meaningful and productive research, and provide valuable public service. This includes fostering civil and open dialogue in support of critical thinking in and out of the classroom, including events hosted by the university.